Because existentialism (by your definition) tends to devolve into a wide variety of evidence-less governing philosophies that all too often end with violence and bloodshed, leading to nihilism. That's the history of the 19th and 20th centuries.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/979476420928839681 …
-
-
I appreciate Sam's scientific attempts to generate morality -- though Comte advocated the same thing, and it ended pretty badly. I agree with a lot of Sam's proposals, but I'm still not convinced by his argument that you can derive "ought" from "is."
-
You can't go straight from 'is' to 'ought', but empirical insights can guide ethical priorities a lot, e.g. actual death rates from semi-auto rifles (300/year) vs. medical errors (100k/year) might inform the ethics of gun control?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.