But what's the common meaning (assuming we actually do need a common meaning rather than framework or OS)? It's something we will need to invent, commit, and recommit to, and thus existentialist in nature. It can't be revealed or discovered like a mountain or lake.https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/979435400446947328 …
-
-
Ive enjoyed reading this thread.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They probably get confused when people talk about “a” deontology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Good thing religions would *never* force any beliefs on anybody. Also there are literally people in this thread arguing all life and morality are meaningless outside their preferred religion.
- 9 more replies
-
-
-
Neither considered themselves existentialists
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m sorry, but WTF did you say?!
#EngrishPreaseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I totally disagree. Utilitarians try to reduce suffering and promote well-being, without believing in supernatural ethics. You don't have to believe ethics are written in the stars, you only have to believe sentience evolved in nervous systems, and that it matters.
- 10 more replies
-
-
-
You've missed the point entirely! When Nietzsche wrote "God is Dead", he marked the unleashing of science and technology from moral limitation. Now, we have no capacity to truly constrain technological advance even as it eclipses our humanity.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.