In my twitter polls a surprisingly large amount of people vote for 'small concrete good' as opposed to 'large abstract good' - for example, more people voted to 'save the life of a child' than 'prevent gender roles from reverting to the 1950s'
-
Show this thread
-
Even though 1950's gender roles would probably end or fuck up countless more childrens' lives (no abortion, anti-divorce pressure prevents a wife from leaving an abusive husband, etc.)
4 replies 2 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
This is exemplary of a really worrying tendency overall - people look at a problem and think "We should fix that," without thinking about the large-scale, long-term impacts of the solution, or considering why the problem arose in the first place
2 replies 8 retweets 62 likesShow this thread -
For example, prostitution sometimes leads to exploitation. Yes, that sucks - but outlawing prostitution *would be even worse* in the same way reverting to 1950s gender roles to save a dying child would be worse, or criminalizing drugs to prevent overdoses would be worse.
2 replies 1 retweet 35 likesShow this thread -
you agree with me so far but I've got my eye on that gun control horizon
3 replies 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread
You're an island of good sense in a sea of irrationality. People have real trouble thinking systemically about unintended consequences and trickle-down effects.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.