That's not the position of the US Constitution. So, seems like we got ourselves a problem....
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly @ag_conservative
So, there's two questions, right? If you want to talk about whether that's constitutional, that's certainly a valid q. But, that's a separate question from whether it's good policy. Are you implicitly conceding that it would be good policy for only the police to have guns?
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @catlin201 @ag_conservative
No, as a libertarian I support
#2A, because I think it deters oppression by a police state.3 replies 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @ag_conservative
The Iraqi population is heavily armed, and that doesn't seem to be deterring oppression by their police state. Why not? The population of the CSA was armed, and that didn't prevent oppression of them by the CSA government. Why not?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Police states maintain power because they have the political support of the public. This idea that an armed population will prevent it is a myth that has no basis in history or political science.
5 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @catlin201 @ag_conservative
Why do tyrants always try to disarm their populations?
4 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @ag_conservative
Do they? The CSA didn't. The KKK didn't. In fact, the KKK loved the idea of an armed population precisely because it enabled them to engage in oppression of the population, not the other way around.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So, first of all, both of those engaged in very substantial oppression of the white population. Both the CSA and the KKK executed whites for their political views. Did an armed population prevent that? On the contrary, it seems to have made it easier!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @catlin201 @hotsodanow and
And in any case, the point is that arming a population isn't what prevents tyranny. What prevents tyranny is a political change in the government to put in a liberal democratic system that gives everyone civil rights.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Civil rights including gun ownership. And, yay, here we are. Problem solved.
-
-
No but gun ownership isn't actually what gives people rights. In fact it often prevents it. The Civil Rights moment focused on using the Federal Government to guarantee legal rights, and that was far and away the most effective way to end the oppression.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.