PS the free speech protections of #1A applied to universities are nicely explained in this guide by @TheFIREorg :https://www.thefire.org/first-amendment-library/special-collections/fire-guides/fires-guide-to-free-speech-on-campus-3/ …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren't they already required by law?
-
In principle, yes. In practice, they don't, because it's too much trouble to sue them.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Public universities are arms of the state, bound by the US Constitution. They often have policies that flagrantly violate
#1A. See@TheFIREorg for details.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
'People can just sue' if someone systematically violates their civil rights is one of the most privileged, unrealistic things I've ever heard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Power granted, has to be power constrained against abuse, and an open-ended invitation is going to be abused eventually. Incremental progress is a frustrating approach but is ultimately more durable, less susceptible to commandeering/resteering/redirection from above.
-
I would agree if I could see any path for incremental progress for academic free speech, but I honestly don't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good lord. You want Donald Trump making these decisions for us?
-
Incidentally *this* is a great example of why I’m a conservative.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.