A biologist, specifically an evolutionary geneticist. Why on earth would we care what a philosopher thinks about a purely empirical question? Most of them don't even know what an Ancestry Informative Marker (AIM) is.
Lewontin wasn't so much wrong as deeply self-deceived and conceptually incoherent due to his overwhelming ideological bias.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
All the more reason for conceptual clarity, the domain of the philosopher. Science is not diminished by this consideration. But you’ve already admitted we shouldn’t care about that.Yet if someone said they didn’t care what a biologist thought you would be (appropriately) outraged
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.