A biologist, specifically an evolutionary geneticist. Why on earth would we care what a philosopher thinks about a purely empirical question? Most of them don't even know what an Ancestry Informative Marker (AIM) is.
-
This is not a purely empirical question. What is a "race" is not an empirical question.
-
-
Because we are arguing about what terms should mean. We aren't merely asking how the world is. Though I agree a philosopher who doesn't know the relevant biology and is talking about this topic is worthless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.