This could be true. It means that manipulative marketing tactics need to be examined more generally...@EvonomicsMag @RobertMKadar @cognitivepolicy @CulturalEvolSoc @EvoInstitute @primalpoly @GadSaad @JonHaidthttps://twitter.com/ENBrown/status/975784392189792264 …
-
This kind of corporate “weaponizing” of information systems truly is a key 21st Century threat that needs to be addressed. I’ve been thinking about Institutional Review Boards and how to implement them in the tech world—imagine how behavioral research would change then.
If corporations had to get IRB approval before every piece of market research, all the automated A/B split testing would collapse....
-
-
I had a stimulating discussion yesterday with a personality researcher I know about how complex the ethics are for this issue. Reminds me of how thorny the use of stem cells was in the 90’s for bioethicists.
-
Perhaps this is something I could organize a special series on for
@tvolmag? What do you think@David_S_Wilson@ericmjohnson?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not necessarily, as the research design including A/B testing might be up for approval by an IRB... more interesting to me is thinking about data sovereignty and the use of blockchain-like tools to grant and revoke permissions around personal data. This is a very complex arena.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.