This could be true. It means that manipulative marketing tactics need to be examined more generally...@EvonomicsMag @RobertMKadar @cognitivepolicy @CulturalEvolSoc @EvoInstitute @primalpoly @GadSaad @JonHaidthttps://twitter.com/ENBrown/status/975784392189792264 …
-
Yuk! Yuk! What's new, perhaps, is that unregulated marketing is deeply dysfunctional for society, something that we must eventually confront, no matter how foreign to the "American way".
I'm deeply concerned about applications of AI and automated data mining in marketing, including political messaging. We'll have no defense once campaign management AIs can automatically test & refine millions of potential messages on millions of people.
-
-
This kind of corporate “weaponizing” of information systems truly is a key 21st Century threat that needs to be addressed. I’ve been thinking about Institutional Review Boards and how to implement them in the tech world—imagine how behavioral research would change then.
-
If corporations had to get IRB approval before every piece of market research, all the automated A/B split testing would collapse....
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This comment is on target. This is already happening.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is possible there are some defenses. The AI behind online adverting were doing this: Bandit Algorithms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-armed_bandit … (I assume they still are.) It is possible you could disrupt their learning. And possible you could disrupt their classification of you.
-
(I built one of the first ad network a long time ago.) (From an engineering point of view, they are interesting to build.) (They combine distributed computing with AI / machine learning. And both topics are interesting.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.