I fail to find anyone in this thread pushing interesting-free rigor. Straw man. It ain’t tough to find misapplied theory in our world of evolution that fails to be rigorous. There are even examples of misapplied evo work that nonetheless found support for the misprediction.
Methodological rigor without theoretical consilience is just science-larping.
-
-
-
Theory sans rigor is, at best, interesting noise. Luckily it ain’t zero sum betwixt the two
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.