Steven Pinker's new book is so cheerfully condescending that even readers inclined to agree with him — that progress is real and hard-won — might feel the stirrings of populist ragehttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/28/books/review-enlightenment-now-steven-pinker.html …
If 550 pages of evidence didn't sway you, what evidence would lead you change your mind about the book's claims? Please, give some specifics.
