Yes, the 0.03% of people who are human geneticists would do that. The bulk of folks who invoke epigenetics don't seem to know anything more about it, than it's a magical talisman to ward off 'genetic reductionism'.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about vertical transfer of microbiome associated mutations?https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609101/ …
-
Transmission of the microbiome is important, but it isn't 'epigenetics' in the proper sense. It's just different organisms with different transmission pathways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or, in my case, "noooo, I was almost enthusiastic, and then Michel Houellebecq
"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. I'm a twin researcher and even I try to stay well away from the H word. It continues to confuse so many. Everything has a genetic and en environmental component so everything is (a little bit) heritable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ain't just leftists who argumentative reason. They aren't even the worst.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In what undergraduate course would you learn the difference?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You could just make a long story short and dive down all the way towards the nature vs nurture paradox. Which one is dominant do you think? Nature? Or nurture?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Funny cuz it's true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When epigenetics hits the New York Review of Books as it did recently...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.