Does it still work as a #costlysignal?
A reminder that, for engagement rings, Moissanite offers more fire and better value than diamond, without the artificial scarcity premium imposed by the De Beers cartel. #ValentinesDaypic.twitter.com/MEZXhWtLtW
-
-
-
More an IQ signal and romantic proof.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It'd still way costlier than cubic zirconia
End of conversation
-
-
-
Diamonds are practically useless but worth more than a thousand words. They work as a commitment signal, that (cheap) talk cannot offer. An intuition backed up by game theory: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/272/1575/1877 …pic.twitter.com/pSFsrdpIkU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
my husband got me a lovely lab-made emerald for short money last Christmas :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If a girls asks me for a ring; I ask her to give me her phone number ...
-
If we discuss diamonds, I pass over a graphite penicil. It’s still carbon, right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm skeptical
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was going to go with a massive uncut diamond, but this works great!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.