It's not sexist. It's just normed by gender. Arguably, that's the opposite of sexist. Do your homework.https://qz.com/1201773/we-took-the-worlds-most-scientific-personality-test-and-discovered-unexpectedly-sexist-results/ …
Funny that the best-established areas of psychology -- intelligence, personality traits, behavior genetics, evolutionary psychology -- are rarely taught in introductory psychology classes.
-
-
But why is it normed by gender?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Credit to my university. I got my money's worth for the intro course.pic.twitter.com/tsDLucxA9C
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is my understanding that these fields also have among the highest representation of women of all scientific fields.
-
The last three do; intelligence research is still a bit male-dominated.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Too many intro psych courses are actually history courses.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In my high school AP Psychology course (basically same as psych 101), we went fairly deep in personality traits and somewhat in intelligence, but behavior genetics and evolutionary psych weren't even covered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.