Geoffrey MillerVerified account

In the land SJWs: there is only power. Defending an SJW-targeted-person is a serious violation. Doesn't matter if they're right. "Right" and "wrong" are tools of oppression. Errors don't occur. If you're cornered, you're wrong, by definition. Only a witch would defend a witch

A more accurate and descriptive term than “SJW” would serve you well. People who would otherwise agree with you will likely resist as “SJW” comes off as an attack on social justice itself.

Because SJW's aren't interested in actual social justice. It's important to make that distinction.

That’s not a helpful description. It’s too subjective.

It's clear that the modern SJW, rather than promoting equality, seeks out inequality everywhere. As in, they're more obsessed with having the crusade than with the solution. It's impossible to promote both equality of outcomes and diversity of the individual at the same time.

How about a term which defines THAT without dragging down the idea of social justice?