Good questions; I don't have answers.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on the geoengineering. Most of them don't work. Regarding population, I support anyone's choice to have kids, but the notion of an unsustainable population is not wrong. Value structures matter here.
-
What do you think max sustainable population is, given reasonably expectable tech advances? Genuinely curious.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
They're playing a fundamentally different game. If the goal is to reduce suffering as much as possible, it seems logical to wipe out all sentient life. However that'll end the game and that's no fun. We want to play the game and reduce suffering in the process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2 - But the majority of the population is not going to stop having children for climatic reasons. So, those who choose not to, will not make any significant impact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tough choice because of the payoffs of
#virtuesignaling.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
let ’em stop breeding, makes it easier for ours to conquer the niche!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thing about climate change is that it's not a simple dehydration, starvation situation. It'll probably precipitate large scale global conflict, possibly nuclear studying Hiroshima and Nagasaki aftermath is enough to convince- not create another life just to experience that
-
Unless of course, if we figure out how to make high IQ telepathic dogs... Then it might be worth considering...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let them take birth control
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.