But that would take technical skill and scope-sensitivity.
Artist Sonia Boyce removes a gorgeous Waterhouse painting from Manchester Art Gallery because of its nudity or something, and considers this an 'artistic act'. HT @clairlemon #MAGSoniaBoyce.https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/jan/31/manchester-art-gallery-removes-waterhouse-naked-nymphs-painting-prompt-conversation?CMP=share_btn_tw …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 3 more replies
-
-
-
-
Not in Italy, in France (Louvre)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Removing art now equals art? Bizarre. What a disgrace for one of my favorite paintings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ffs, I'm a heterosexual female and Waterhouse is one of my favorite artists. This is ridiculous. News flash: people go to art galleries to see art, not empty walls.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All this mediocre "artist" demonstrated was her seething jealousy at the sheer artistic brilliance of J. W. Waterhouse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I bought a poster of this painting with the first money I ever earned (babysitting).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who would have thought a painting from the Victorian erase would need to be censored.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.