Do you factor in environmental destruction, deforestation and species extinction? Would those factors not mitigate a good job?
Global GDP (gross world product): 1900: $1 trillion. 2017: $79 trillion. Good job, species. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_world_product …pic.twitter.com/GCls71K6kq
-
-
-
(In all probability) No (to 1st Q), and Yes (to 2nd).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That bubble is worse than bitcoin!! Must be a ponzi scheme...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blah blah blah, something about inequality and climate change, blah blah.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$79 trillion / 7.6 billion is closer to $10k per capita.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
suddenly the bull stock market feels fine
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m guessing you didn’t notice that the graph you posted isn’t on the Wikipedia link you posted...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder when world's population will reach carrying capacity.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's with mouths that need food, permitted by agricultural surplus. Wait until the robots walk into the picture and only need to eat wind turbine electricity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.