Starting with Mars isn't most cost effective plan. We can and should fill Earth with trillions or more ems before we start to do much on Mars.
Ultimate goals: Republicans: 'next year, a little more of this' Democrats: 'next year, a little less of that' Any political party I could actually get excited about: 'Populate the future light cone with quadrillions of free, happy, sentient beings. Starting with Mars.'pic.twitter.com/YkLfaJQRcL
-
-
-
Antarctica, Iceland, the open sea - all are more hospitable
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just quadrillions? Sad!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(Lol)-piece of cake
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wish I were twice as smart as I am. Then I'd half understand this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is sentience (as good a thing as that is) a requirement?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I honestly believe that bypassing the Moon and the near-Earth asteroids to go to Mars first would be a serious mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not start with Earth? We can make good progress while finishing the tech needed for a Mars colony.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Right, which is *everything not in either the past or future light-cone*. What does the flat plane drawn for the present represent?
- 7 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.