The descent of Scientific American: Damore never claimed for one second that women were intellectually inferior to men. That's a lie:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/darwin-was-sexist-and-so-are-many-modern-scientists/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sa-editorial-social&utm_content=&utm_term=policy_blog_text_&sf176712275=1 …
-
-
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
.
@Horganism also misrepresented my 'Mating Mind' book as claiming male intellectual superiority, when I clearly and repeatedly argued against that view. He simply didn't read the book, and he'll libel any scientists who challenge his narrative.3 replies 15 retweets 146 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @jordanbpeterson
Actually you misquote ME
@primalpoly. I say YOU say that men write more books because natural selection "made males more aggressive in pursuit of status than females." Do you deny that?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
How could you get so many things wrong in such a short blog? 1) I was writing about a mating strategy dimorphism, not a mental capacity dimorphism 2) I was talking about sexual selection, not natural selection 3) I never used any arguments to 'justify sexual inequality'.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.