The descent of Scientific American: Damore never claimed for one second that women were intellectually inferior to men. That's a lie:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/darwin-was-sexist-and-so-are-many-modern-scientists/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sa-editorial-social&utm_content=&utm_term=policy_blog_text_&sf176712275=1 …
. @Horganism also misrepresented my 'Mating Mind' book as claiming male intellectual superiority, when I clearly and repeatedly argued against that view. He simply didn't read the book, and he'll libel any scientists who challenge his narrative.
-
-
Actually you misquote ME
@primalpoly. I say YOU say that men write more books because natural selection "made males more aggressive in pursuit of status than females." Do you deny that? -
How could you get so many things wrong in such a short blog? 1) I was writing about a mating strategy dimorphism, not a mental capacity dimorphism 2) I was talking about sexual selection, not natural selection 3) I never used any arguments to 'justify sexual inequality'.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Precisely the same logical jumps people made when calling Charles Murray and The Bell Curve racist; regardless of author’s motive, inter-group differences infer an agenda..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
#author I want you love me in the desert please come on your pony! Years are heavy may be and ponies are heavy too but you who have so much enemies even when sitting shy and gentle in a bar, will come to me when somebody has hurt you - I'll kill him by your pain, and you will bepic.twitter.com/9ftlFRrUua
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.