It's violence in support of an ideological goal. Whether the goal advocates violence is immaterial.
Terrorism implies following a specific ideology that advocates violence. Atheism doesn't advocate violence.
-
-
-
Violence in support of advancing Jainism Or Buddhism would still be terrorism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The ideology would be “kill Christians,” not “I’m an atheist.”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Atheism is not an ideology. The only commonality between unvelievers is their lack of faith. Plus, no doctrinal motivation.
-
It kind of is in the hands of Dawkins...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The dialectical-materialist version does.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looks like he was there to kill his mother in law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's complicated. Does one person's idiosyncratic belief system constitute an "ideology"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The reaction to the religious by atheists after this shooting explains why people will not vote for atheists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.