It's the ancestrally normal way to accomplish this function, so it's probably more efficient, cheaper, fewer side effects.
New 'senolytics' may clear out senescent, toxic cells & slow aging. I bet intermittent fasting works even better. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/to-stay-young-kill-zombie-cells/ …
-
-
-
Unfortunately caloric restriction which worked in dogs does NOT work in humans. Human fertility window long enough to outlast famines etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Senolytics *repair* some damage/a cause of ageing, while intermittent fasting can only slow accumulation of new damage (so my spies tell me)
-
I think fasting can clear old debris.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Question is: should we stay young? In the developed world, people already become 80 years old easily. Isn't that enough?
-
No. More life is better. Older people are wiser.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There really is no branch of science as polluted with social bias as the effects of diet on health. We knew more 70 years ago than today.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Individual differences + habitation. Works for me if I don’t go beyond weekly fasts. Nothing beyond getting hungry, so better done outside.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s not about living forever, it’s about living healthy with what you’ve got.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Once a week 24h fasting is fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.