![∃𝑋[∅∈𝑋∧∀𝑦(𝑦∈𝑋⇒𝑦∪{𝑦}∈𝑋)]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/976278603989168129/5nzgS7j4_normal.jpg)
Fish are simple. Policy is simple.
Policy is simple. Run the game theory. Find Pareto-superior Nash equilibria given stakeholder incentives. Why can't politicians get this?pic.twitter.com/1Xjw67cbJY
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Values are folded into utility functions....
-
That’s one hell of a compression function you’ve discovered!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Local optima. Public Choice Theory got the essentials right. (Good policy is so under-incentivized it isn't even funny.)
-
Welllll.... it’s kinda funny
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you assume politics is about the public good then politics is very confusing. Change assumptions and it will make a lot more sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have you read "Game Theory and the Social Contract"? It's a good but unknown book on this intersection. Only toy games are solvable, ofc.
-
yeah except Ken Binmore is not exactly easy to read
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Unfortunately, reality remains fundamentally nonlinear, and undermines all attempts at application of closed form solutions.
-
Any theoretical system that presumes such patent nonsense as perfect rationality and agents motivated by utility maximisation has no place in influencing policy in the real world
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.