Or they don't publish enough to do so very much.
82% of peer-reviewed papers in the humanities are never cited. Not even once. #postmodernism #intersectionality #sadhttp://www.intellectualtakeout.org/blog/why-professors-are-writing-crap-nobody-reads …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The triumph of peer review in the sciences is a tragedy. In the humanities it's a low comedy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Strange the article you've linked provides so little evidence (links to papers) & of those links to "evidence", half don't link any papers.
-
@jidenteki_kioku actually did some analysis & found the number of uncited papers to be much lower (for 2005 onwards)https://jidentekikioku.wordpress.com/2016/11/01/the-true-percentage-of-scientific-articles-that-will-never-be-cited/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
dont worry, soon they will be fed into AI with contextual search & retrieval. data production velocity is too much for humans to utilize.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
82% of them are rehashed garbage with conclusions that are unsupported by the citations they used to make their rationalizations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great piece with lots of helpful distinctions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some people love the smell of their own farts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And it got 5 more cites in 5 months...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.