Geoffrey MillerVerified account

The core point that people take issue with in your document is not a psychological one. It's about female quantitative aptitude.

As it relates to biological / neurological makeup. And your conclusions from the existing body of research on the subject.

But really it's interpretation that's off. Not the research. You draw conclusions that are based on misconstrual of the research.

And it's hard to tell whether it's intentional on your part. Is it bad faith self-serving propaganda or sincere misunderstanding?

And when you follow it up with doubling down, it looks less like you have an interest in intellectual inquiry

And more like you have issues with women.

And i'm sure there are people patting you on the back for it. Peter Thiel, etc

But you're not a martyr. You just gave a voice to every closet misogynist working in tech and those people don't give a damn about inquiry