Geoffrey MillerVerified account

I hate that I have to choose between "intuition" and "reason and evidence;" my gut/instinct are crucial complements to my rational brain.

Yes, but there's often evolutionary mismatch between Pleistocene intuitions and the modern moral landscape.

Reason is a faulty tool at best.

Reason and evidence but given that ethics and its relationship with the physical world is intractable, we will *have* to use intuition too.

And this is answering without rigorously defining these terms. There is considerable scope to what people tend to mean by moral intuition.

Morality is context-driven

Yes, insofar as consequentialism requires analyzing the whole context of well-being vs. suffering across time, space, & sentient beings.

I would say objective survival and time-tested traditions for aspects of the world that haven't changed.

When people discuss morality they seem to miss that nature strikes a balance between competition and collaboration. Best related via stories