Getting caught after violent crime 45% heritable. Correlation with committing crime unknown. Maybe twin A learned from B's error.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this a relative measure? Otherwise, how does it square with large rises and falls in average crime rates?
-
Cellphones/cheap security cams/Compstat/better policing/teen contraception/work programs/mass incarceration do a lot of the reduction...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where are you going with this? We shouldn't punish? We should sterilise criminals or tweak their kids' genes? Just curious and concerned...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Either way, heritability is inherently relative, since it measures the effect of genes v environment on population *variance* in a trait.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What have I got wrong in the above?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, I know that. It still means that if h2 = 42%, then the sum of environmental factors on variance in the population (inc error) = 58%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but pre-birth enviro effects are part of the 58%, ergo, upbringing cannot be more than, but can be less than 58%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, this is true. If everyone had an identical upbringing (including exposure to social influences on crime, ofc), h2 would be 100%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd describe the distinction between shared & non-shared environment as a sensible & necessary elaboration of the theory,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.