What would be non-obvious to you? There are well-replicated psych findings showing race, class & sex intersections in predicting PTSD probs.pic.twitter.com/CditSNfEet
Sincere question: are there any well-replicated, non-obvious, empirical findings from 'Intersectionality Theory'? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality …pic.twitter.com/ndZXsn5oY6
-
-
-
Those sound like additive effects, not interaction effects. Where's the 'Intersectionality'?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There's a study cited in the wiki that seems to support claims about how stereotypes interact. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103111001545?via%3Dihub …
-
Being straight led to more +ive evaluations of whites while being gay did that for blacks even though intersectionality wd predict black+gay
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not on the theory, but "intersectional" biology has plenty of insights that explain mixed-identity outcome differences in non-Marxist ways.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See Crenshaw's early articles in law journals
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Question formulation: Complementary goods added together exhibit less declining marginal utility than substitute goods. So ..
-
.. are intersectionality social capital traits (stereotypes/stigmas) generally complementary or substitute 'bads'? (I'd guess latter.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s are hard question for lots of social science subfields.
-
In econ most interesting findings are violations of theoretical expectations, i.e. ‘anomalies.’ At least gets you ‘non-obvious.’
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.