ISIS van attack kills 12, injures 80. Wonder if MSM will take this seriously, or keep obsessing about statue removal http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/17/barcelona-terror-attack-van-crashes-crowd-la-rambla-killing/ …
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly
Geoffrey, don't do this. Here's the front pages of every major "MSM" website right now. 1/2pic.twitter.com/hM7XjlnyI2
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AlanLevinovitz
Of course MSM covers it. The question is how they apportion the blame, and what explanatory framework they use.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly
Is that a question? The blame is squarely on horrific Islamic extremist terrorism. The explanation? They are monsters. 1/
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AlanLevinovitz
Blaming just the 'extremists' ducks more fundamental questions, e.g. Saudi Arabia supporting Wahhabist mosques and funding terrorism.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly
Sure. But the best, most incisive analyses come from scholars and media. Period. Like this
@TheAtlantic classic: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/ …2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's a complicated question--don't get me wrong. I'm just critiquing broad brush vilification of "MSM" as extremely counterproductive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I may also be biased since MSM journalists routinely vilify my research field of evo psych, without bothering to understand it.
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly @TheAtlantic
Totally with you. It's absurd. IMO, partly the fault of naturalistic fallacy: if nature has *any* hierarchy, bias = justified.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.