There's a weird rumor @RichardDawkins's h-index is 3, so he's 'not a real scientist'. Nope. His h-index is c. 63
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=richard+dawkins&hl=en&as_sdt=0,32 …pic.twitter.com/ucm0ORvRy6
-
This is from the link you posted earlier. Richard Dawkins, Biologist 1,030,000 followers
@RichardDawkins H-index: 3 E-index: 58
Yes, that's wrong. I don't know where they got H-index 3, so I checked it myself.
-
-
Glad you did. I never doubted he was an actual scientist (though I do doubt his concept of memes is sound).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.