h-index is the mismeasure of "science"
So amusing when someone like @pzmyers (h-index around 8) calls someone with an h-index of 51 a 'pseudo-scientist'https://2020science.org/2014/10/06/engaged-research-scientists-twitter/ …
-
-
-
Choose any metric you like. Total citations. Total publications. Same discrepancy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ha. I know, right. His h-index is only 35. And I am like, oh shit, that thing goes past 10?
-
To be fair, Slavoj Zizek has an h-index of 111 whereas mine is 9 and I'm quite comfortable calling him a pseudo-scientist!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Too late! Dear God is that sickening. Probably best to base arguments on merits and leave credentialism to others.
-
someone should make a script to adjudicate prior twitter beefs and declare the winner based on who has the highest h-index
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Por cierto de Myers me refiero a la época que hasta schwarz era super fan de él. Lo que deja el feminismo xD (ya pocos lo pelan)pic.twitter.com/MqIpMfjHS8
-
Ahora creo que ni de loco tuitearía que es fan de Myers jeje (aquí sí están esos tuits de Schwarz. lo ultra-feminista le dejó poco jepic.twitter.com/3YeFv34u2Q
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not doing MN proud...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
perhaps this "scientific study" can somewhere explain the phenomenon ? http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)01109-4 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.