I do. I thought it involved factual research, but it seems to be mostly 'opposition research'....
Journalists: before you claim 'sex differences can't be biological!', maybe read at least book on the topic? Here: https://www.amazon.com/Primate-Sexuality-Comparative-Studies-Prosimians/dp/0199676615/ …pic.twitter.com/tXm7DT5yIy
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm on kinds of spectra, no doubt. You saw my neurodiversity piece, yes?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair, that kind of misrepresents what "journalists" are saying in the same way that many journalists misrepresented the memo. 1/3
-
I think what journalists are saying is that sex differences are not a likely explanation of (most) workplace gender inequity. 2/3
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
...or maybe if more folks had shown interest in such titles; prices would have come down via Economies of Scale!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People, including journalists, don't care for facts any more. We truly live in the post-fact society.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
While there can be objectivity in terms of facts, there can't be total objectivity in societal preferences given facts, so it is tricky.
-
It's best to encourage journalists to look as widely as possible into diverse sources than to simply be objective.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
because you're not woke enough
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Razib, can you follow me for a DM?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.