Leftist paper weaponizes global warming into anti-natalist eco-guilt trip in nation with sub-replacement fertility. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/12/want-to-fight-climate-change-have-fewer-children?CMP=twt_gu …
-
As have I. I eased into retirement in 2007, & it's been my primary hobby since. As an engineer & a skeptic, geoengineering looks iffy to me.
I would appreciate reading your favorite critique if you send a reference.
-
-
Depends which technique you're talking about. Cloud seeding? Aerosols? Carbon capture (soil, subterranean)? Carbon fiber manufacture?
-
To be clear, I'm happy for my tax dollars to go to researching *all* potentially viable geoengineering options. Not counting on any, tho.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Which geoengineering approach do you think is the most viable? It always puzzles me how calm you are about climate change.
-
I was genuinely offering to provide Geoffrey w/ a critique on geoengineering. But, I didn't get any narrowing of that broad solution space.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.