not if the CIA supports and arms its extremists to change the government and undermine the sovereignty.
A sovereign state is ultimately responsible for all violence committed within its borders.
-
-
-
If a few CIA guys and a few million dollars can undermine a 'sovereign state', then it's already a failed state, right?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Then the state has no accountability to reduce crime, keep peace, or provide national security, yes?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Responsible as in to blame or responsible as in to handle/punish? Or both?
-
However you want to interpret the question. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Certainly if a state allows invasion, it would be responsible for such a colossal failure of security.
-
And that speaks to the question I just asked on it's failure to repel invaders. Can ultimate defeat be seen as a form of complicity here?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
false if the violence isn't state sanctioned. eg - outside attack by another state or domestic insurrection.
-
The two most fundamental duties of a state would be to prevent such catastrophies, IMHO.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wow at the closeness of this!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.