IMHO we're nowhere near Earth's carrying capacity, given predictable improvements in technology and sustainability.
Given evolution, the deep political conflict is Anti-Natalist v. Pro-Natalist. All else (Left v. Right, SJW v. NRx) follows from that.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this suffers from western centric point of view: natal debates rage most fiercely in the US, seems much less an issue everwhere else
-
Yeah, anti-natalist culture won the war in Europe, which has birth rates almost entirely below population replacement levels.pic.twitter.com/qWL6ootxc2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No need for pro-natalists to be anti-contraception; contraception's very useful in careers, mate choice, timing birth intervals, etc.
-
I wonder if it's less a case of no one gets to have it as nationalist cherry picking of who is most deserving with the fewest obstacles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Anti-natalism is rarely explicitly anti-baby. It's usually just prioritizing short-term virtue-signaling over civilizational sustainability.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This claims a lot, but says very little
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have thoughts about this but I'm too morning sick to articulate any of them at the moment :-P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Means a lot to outer fringes of conservatism and progressivism. Liberals are agnostic; ie see no role for govt in coercing or incentivising.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.