I've been calling this the 'massively pleiotropic mutation model' for about 17 years, but whatever. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/06/its-like-all-connected-man/530532/ …
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly
Its not the same as pleiotropy. The argument isnt that the proteins or genes' direct functions are pleiotropic. Rather they act in concert.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrAdamFreeman
I argued for a many-to-many mapping from genes to traits. Pleiotropic from the genes' viewpoint, polygenic from the traits' viewpoint.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly
It's a thing of semantics, tgen, albeit it critical. How direct need an effect be to be pleiotropic? Id argue only direct molecular actions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @DrAdamFreeman
I used the term more in the classical quantitative genetics sense, not the molecular mechanism sense. So, #semantics
2:43 AM - 17 Jun 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.