Not a flawless or 100% unbiased article, but I found it mostly to support research just to understand the public health implications.pic.twitter.com/9bKnPJ6vL5
Yes, but why assume more research on gun violence will support restrictions on #2A? Astounding hubris, @NatureNewshttp://www.nature.com/news/fight-the-silencing-of-gun-research-1.22139 …
-
-
-
I support more research; I'm just wary that gov't funding agencies could support politically unbiased research.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And previous research tended to ignore deterrence effects, and minor benefits like being able to resist tyranny ...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Bad thinking overall, won't people just use other means (knives, pills, cars) to kill others or themselves?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Never interrupt your enemy when he is in the process of making a mistake
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.