IMHO Haier shows the Vox piece was written in bad faith, intentionally misrepresenting the podcast. Which 'demolishes' its credibility.
Richard Haier, editor of 'Intelligence', demolishes that Vox piece criticizing @charlesmurray and @SamHarrisOrg. Vox refused to print this.https://twitter.com/quillettem/status/874013151716532224 …
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Guys, there's no reason to get ad hominem about this issue; it's relatively trivial semantics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Becomes kind of team sport where changing your mind is tantamount to defeat or betrayal, so everyone incentivized to become more strident.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So instead you're picking apart a word in a tweet instead of dealing with the substance within? Seems legit.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah it's a very American form of tub-thumping which does not necessarily play well in other countries, as well. Imagine saying it out loud.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FWIW in the podcast Murray states that the test participants self-identified their racial affiliation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah when people use those terms it makes me want to NOT read the article. It's childish, got 'im!! Type media, can't stand it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure the editor of intelligence needs to involve himself in clickbait.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.