@i_contemplate_ @DegenRolf I lost my scientific innocence when nobody was shocked by thishttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416456/ …
-
-
-
then I learned how hard people have ignored statistical power for decades http://psych.colorado.edu/~willcutt/pdfs/Maxwell_2004.pdf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My diagnostic indicator of skeptic versus cynic in the replication movement is their assessment of the implicit bias literature.
@DegenRolf -
Yeah I don't get this, but would like to :P
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This doesn't seem to account for the fact that bias is a heuristic that can be overcome by conscious effort, so quantifying it is tricky.
-
One of the main things about implicit bias is its meant to occur whether you want it to or not though right?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
More scientists should publish papers open source & blog about findings. Public has limited access to knowledge. Causes issues like this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't issue w/whether there's impt variation in bias across people and whether tests can capture it, not abs avg level of implicit bias?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess. But the concept of “implicit bias” goes back at least as far as, “Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will defer judgement until I hear this from a more reliable source.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.