From gwas? In 20k people, .001 SNPs will be almost all non replicable. Only carried by 20 people in the sample & hi call error rates
-
-
-
Greml-ms, and only the 7k unrelateds. SEs are large, true. Consistent with kin-based data, Evans et al. though. Still concerned?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
These are variance components so we can't say.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Is this from "Genomic analysis of family data reveals additional genetic effects on intelligence and personality" http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/02/06/106203 … ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wonder if bottom IQ half has higher R2 than top half, looking just w/in those two samples. As most mutations bad, would suspect so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.