This @voxdotcom piece includes a key, libel-y misquote from @SamHarrisOrg on @charlesmurray (real transcript below)
http://bit.ly/2qvtTwM pic.twitter.com/hTKYDPwogs
Just listen to the first 10 minutes of the podcast and read the Vox piece; you'll see where the Vox piece mis-represents.
-
-
I second Paul, you highlight a quote that is in the article verbatim and imply it's misquoted.
-
The article misquoted the podcast. That is the whole point. It's not that complicated, people.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
1) The misquote is telling. A bigger problem is that the article makes a number of points that Murray emphasizes, without acknowledgement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2) Another issue: The article states or strongly implies that Murray doesn't consider evidence that he clearly addresses in the podcast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.