But there were strong theoretical reasons to suspect ovulatory cycle shifts -- just as one sees in thousands of other mammal species.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, I think there are shifts in some preferences (and in attractiveness), but I've become more skeptical about the facial masculinity thing.
-
We've got another preprint addressing the hormones-attractiveness linkhttps://mobile.twitter.com/biorxivpreprint/status/862396853094150145 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
also the preference for masculine faces in short-term mating seems like a small effect overwhelmed by heritability https://www2.psy.uq.edu.au/~uqbziets/Zietsch%20et%20al%202015%20Variation%20in%20facial%20masculinity%20prefs%20better%20explained%20by%20genetic%20differences%20than%20by%20context-dependent%20factors.pdf …
-
Our context effect is small, but Zietsch looked at the between-women effect and we looked within women to control for heritable effects.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
conclusion is: women prefer more masculine faces all the time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the meme has escaped. 150 years from now, it will still be Settled Science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Real science has to leave rubbish inductivist "studies" & "research" behind, just get on with proper scientific guessing & testing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My research, confirming others, found that ovulating women will rate masculine faces as belonging to better husbands.
-
In other words, the context of the preference will moderate the effect.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.