I thought you would want the MINIMAL H-index conditional on citations. More in line with signaling. High impact with minimum work.
TFW your h-index hits 50. (Which I fully realize means nothing to most people, but it gives academics a warm glow) https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=vEqE_rUAAAAJ&hl=en …
-
-
-
My h-index to total citation ratio is pretty good. And, if you're not writing papers that fail to get cited, you're not taking enough risks!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yay. Someone understands... :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But, dude, you got the job at the place! Congrats.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
"H ratio" minimizes variance of citations across publications. It institutionalizes mediocrity. Better max citations from little work.
-
The H-index caters to those who practice a "least publishable unit" approach. This is an enemy of quality scientific literature.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah man, congrats big time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.