Sounds like someone saw 1 too many episodes of "Sex and the City" and thought they were doing "Science".
Cover story on the non-monogamy trend is long on human interest anecdotes but short on prevalence data and science. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/magazine/is-an-open-marriage-a-happier-marriage.html?smid=tw-nytmag&smtyp=cur&referer=https://t.co/b9vT5TdVWT …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
..data is useless. And, fwiw, I've lived in a contented open relationships for nearly 30 years. Snooty comments are unseemly
-
I'm teaching a class on poly & open relationships next semester and am just frustrated with the lack of science. I'm very sympathetic to it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
a man sharing his mate is not preferred by evol; i.e., the genes of men who were cuckolded die out; and, women need resources for offspring.
-
That's a reasonable argument, but it's being challenged in various ways. And modern mating systems don't have to follow Pleistocene ones.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't see why you are moaning. Every couple copes with their problems in a different way. This can only be illustrated with anecdotes....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you mistake scientism for science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.