Charles Murray’s supposedly Provocative Talk was judged moderate by college profs who read it unaware of its author.https://nyti.ms/2oL3jz2
This is actually what 52 of the 'scholarly peers' thought of the Bell Curve research: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence#CITEREFGottfredson1997 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What makes you call them 'conservative', beyond the fact that they actually understand intelligence research?
#catch22
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Of course it is. That's how liberals demonize it.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Did you listen to
@sbkaufman interview with James Flynn? Flynn mentioned that "Murray is certainly without racial bias... when he makes a point, you can bet your bottom dollar that he has evidence and support for it, and it is worth to take into account" https://scottbarrykaufman.com/podcast/nature-nurture-and-human-autonomy-with-james-flynn/ …pic.twitter.com/QiF5nhS4HL
-
Where did you get the transcription?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.