1. Medicare is Single Payer. It needs hard rationing bc 80% of healthcare costs come after 80. 2. Deregulate 3. Only catastrophic policies.
Sickest 1% of Americans use more health care money than healthiest 75%. Huge adverse selection insurance problem.http://wapo.st/2o63p46
-
-
-
Agree. I'd prefer total privatization and deregulation, to drive down costs, promote R&D, and incentivize healthy lifestyles.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's irrelevant if it's viable or not if no harsh reforms of Social Security, Medicare they'll go belly up in the 2030s.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's due to lifestyle choices in a rich country: overeating, over drinking, smoking etc. The dark side of liberty, making wrong choices.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The reason why that the Nordic welfare states fare better healthwise is twofold, hard paternalism, genetics/culture.pic.twitter.com/UKXTwtQ3Ij
-
"The Myth of Americans' Poor Life Expectancy" -
@Avik http://bit.ly/2oCYnNF pic.twitter.com/Hg48reJ7mC
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
US regulators are captured by the AMA, hospitals, pharmaceutical industry. Public Choice 101. US regulators protects incumbents, not insured
-
We are in total agreement on that part.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yea bc there's no hard caps. Hard caps means that when money runs out, no more treatments that fiscal year.
-
That's true, but the fundamental issue remains COST. Lobbies and corrupt congress prevent the federal government from even negotiating drug
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.