They even wrote in a neat little exception so that whatever hate speech actually means, it certainly doesn't mean attacking whites: "While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups...the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority"
Reddit just did a massive purge of groups they claim engage in 'hate speech'. I defy the craven, witless gimplets running big tech censorship culture to provide any objective definition of 'hate speech'. De facto, it seems to mean anything that offends the people they fear.https://twitter.com/CaseyNewton/status/1277648071514415107 …
-
-
-
Women are the majority in the US (50.52%). Is Reddit not going to protect women?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Gimplet” is the coinage we need and deserve.
-
I didn't invent it, but I sure am going to signal boost it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Craven, witless gimlets.” Oh, that’s good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Big Tech/Social Media is now a Kafka Trap House
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hate speech should be illegal. Who defines hate speech? At first, it might be someone whose views align with yours. But eventually, inevitably, it will be THE PERSON YOU LEAST WANT TO HAVE THAT JOB.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Elections are coming.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People actually use Reddit? Time for a free speech alternative then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pure censorship.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.