APS and its editors are aware of concerns with “Declines in Religiosity Predict Increases in Violent Crime—but Not Among Countries With Relatively High Average IQ,” & are examining the article & review process. We welcome all comments/criticisms psci@psychologicalscience.org
-
There are quite serious methodological and statistical flaws in this paper. Revisiting published work in light of that is the part of scientific inquiry that lets us claim it’s occasionally self correcting. To not subject published work to scrutiny would be gutless and craven.
It you don't like the paper, publish a new paper that challenges it. Don't adopt SJW tactics to censor results you don't like.
-
-
I am preparing a commentary. Do you find this paper methodologically and statistically sound? what sjw tactics are you accusing me of? Tweeting?
-
I mean, if we take the Lynn measures this paper uses at face value, the that implies that north of 40% are Africans are intellectually disabled. Does that sound plausible to you, based on your work (Mating Mind to today)?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wrong. Publishing a whole paper sometimes the right way to go, but it can be : - unnecessarily slow - disconnected from the subject - overkill for a small but important comment And in most cases, the journal won't accept it. Discussing isn't censoring.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it really SJW tactics to point out obvious flaws in a paper? It should be the norm. Is has nothing to do with SJW:s. Which is a deeply flawed term to use anyways.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe we need to take a closer look at your publications. I wonder whether they hold up when you are unable to evaluate the scientific merits of other papers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.