It reads like he is stuck in the 2000's textbook psychology before the replication crisis. He uncritically uses outdated experiment anecdotes to make a point similarly to how laymen talk about psychology. Not data but anecdotes. Completely unconvincing.https://reason.com/2019/10/22/orchestra-study-blind-auditions-gelman/ …
-
-
-
Fixed answers in search of a longed-for problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hilarious that we've all been taught to laugh at phrenology, physiognomy, witch trials etc. while implicit bias went unnoticed. I wondered how our ancestors could have been so implausibly gullible. History teaches nothing. It's mainly used to distract.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren't these implicit bias studies failing to replicate anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.